| |
Teaching of global
warming flawed, says
chemistry chief
Climate change and
global warming
teaching in schools is
flawed through
omission,
simplification and
misrepresentation, says the Royal
Society of Chemistry's chief
executive. "The problem needs to
be addressed if the UK is to play a
key role in tackling the issues
raised and exploiting related
business opportunities," says Dr
Richard Pike.
He added: "These deficiencies
are partly the result of needing to
give youngsters easily digested
concepts, but many teachers now
agree that in doing so there is the
risk of losing sight of the bigger
picture."
That picture is not being
articulated because of the very
limited, quantitative references
to climate change in school text
books, if at all, says the head of
the 43,000 member society.
"Support from web-based
organisations is making progress,
but is fragmented and lacks
engagement with leading
academics and industrialists in
the field."
Dr Pike highlighted the four
key facts children should know,
but have been distorted or
overlooked:
- Water vapour, not smoke,
emerges from cooling
towers. These structures are
needed whether the heat
source is from bio-fuels,
concentrated solar rays, coal,
gas or nuclear and are
necessary to cool down the
circulating vapour (usually
steam) that drives the turbines
for electricity generation. The
heating of water for highpressure
steam to pass
through the turbines, followed
by condensation, is a
fundamental process in the
power industry. The use of
pictures of cooling towers as
'iconic' representations of
global warming, therefore, is
completely false, as even
'green' energy will need these
facilities. Additionally, the
water vapour emitted from
these towers forms part of the
natural water cycle.
- Very low-sulphur fuels can
be worse for the
environment than highersulphur
fuels. Although they
are attractive for consuming
countries, their manufacture
from oil, gas or coal elsewhere
is energy-intensive and
therefore globally can leave a
larger carbon footprint than
conventional higher-sulphur
fuels. In the extreme, a tonne
of natural gas will produce
only half a tonne of liquid fuel,
with the remaining half tonne
being consumed in the
manufacturing process, with
associated releases of carbon
dioxide. This emphasises the
need for full life-cycle analysis
of energy processes. This
example also illustrates the
difficult balance between
reducing pollution and acid
rain in one location, while
adding inadvertently to global
warming.
- Oil and other fossil fuels
may be burned for another
century. Whatever advances
are made in renewable and
nuclear power, there is likely to
be a transition period of at
least 100 years during which
fossil fuels will continue to be
burned globally, driven by the
inertia of millions of people
depending on their countries'
oil, gas and coal production for
their own economic
prosperity. High priority must
be placed on the technologies
of carbon dioxide capture and
storage and the coordination
of this.
Even today, throughout the
world, tens of millions of
tonnes per day of carbon
dioxide would need to be
removed from the atmosphere
just to keep the concentration
of this gas constant. This puts
into perspective the scale of all
other activities to reduce
global warming. Perversely,
even when use of fossil fuels
ceases, there could still be
further warming. This is
because there will be fewer
particles of soot in the
atmosphere to reflect sunlight
and a greater proportion of the
sun's energy will then reach
the Earth's surface.
- Energy storage and
transportation (as electricity
or hydrogen generated from
electricity) will be essential
for long-term sustainability.
Like many of the energy issues
for the future, these will be
resolved only through the
application of an innovative
scientific base in this country,
coupled with strong leadership
linking education with
society's needs and
encouraging constructive
engagement amongst all
interested parties.
Dr Pike added: "Young people are
clearly concerned about global
warming and we all have a
collective responsibility to ensure
that they are well informed and
feel confident in challenging the
status quo for the benefit of us
all."
| |

Photo of a geo-thermal power station
cooling tower in New Zealand.
Cooling towers emit steam, not
smoke, and are used for all types of
energy generation.
|